But that is exactly what 
happened Friday. A court in Moscow sentenced the three members of the 
feminist punk band Pussy Riot to two years in prison.
In my two decades 
monitoring human rights in Russia I've never seen anything like the 
Pussy Riot case -- the media attention, the outpouring of public 
support, the celebrity statements for the detained and criminally 
charged punk band members.
The image of three young 
women facing down an inexorable system of unfair justice and an 
oppressive state has crystallized for many in the West what is wrong 
with human rights in Russia. To be sure, it is deeply troubling.
For me, even more shocking were the images of Stanislav Markelov, a human rights lawyer, lying on the sidewalk with the back of his head blown off in 2009, or the body of tax lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, who died in prison in 2009 after he blew the whistle on a massive government extortion scheme.
The Pussy Riot case 
shines a much needed, if highly disturbing, spotlight on the issue of 
freedom of expression in post-Soviet Russia
On February 21, four members of the group
 performed what they call a "punk prayer" in Moscow's Russian Orthodox 
Christ the Savior Cathedral. They danced around and shouted some words 
to their song, "Virgin Mary, Get Putin Out." The stunt lasted less than a
 minute before the women were forcibly removed.
The same day, a video
 widely shared on social media showed a montage of the stunt with the 
song spliced in. The song criticizes the Russian Orthodox Church's 
alleged close relationship with the Kremlin and the personally close 
relationship of President Vladimir V. Putin with the patriarch of the 
Russian Orthodox Church.
Three of the band members were tried on criminal "hooliganism" charges. Their trial was theater of the absurd. In their closing statements, the women and their lawyers delivered devastating critiques of the state of justice and civic freedoms in Russia.
'Pussy Riot' convicted and sentenced
Madonna shows support for jailed band
During the Soviet era, 
the human rights landscape in Russia was stark. But since then the 
situation has been harder to figure out, often making it easier for 
outsiders simply to give the government a pass. But the devil is in the 
details.
It has been incredibly difficult to pin down
 any involvement of officials in the beatings and murders of 
investigative journalists and human rights activists. And the 
government, while not silencing civil society groups outright, tries to 
marginalize, discredit, and humiliate them, and crush them with 
heavy-handed bureaucracy, trumped-up accusations, threats and the like.
Whatever misdemeanor the
 three women incurred for their antics in the church should not have 
been transformed by the authorities into a criminal offense that in 
effect punishes them for their speech. It's typical, though, of how the 
authorities try to keep a lid on controversial issues. The Russian think
 tank SOVA
 has documented dozens of cases in recent years in which the authorities
 used the threat of extremism charges to silence critics.
This also isn't the 
first time Russian authorities have misused criminal legislation to 
stifle critical artistic expression. In 2010 a Moscow district court found
 the co-organizers of a controversial art exhibit guilty of the vague 
charge of "inciting religious hatred." The art exhibit organizers were 
fined.
By making the Pussy Riot
 band members await trial in jail for almost six months, the authorities
 made clear how they plan to set boundaries for political criticism.
After a winter of 
unprecedented, peaceful opposition protests, a dozen demonstrators whom 
the authorities claim were involved in a scuffle with police during a 
mass demonstration in May have been arrested and are being charged with 
crimes grossly disproportionate to their alleged actions. Police have searched opposition leaders' homes.
Laws rammed through 
Russia's parliament this summer sent more signals: criminal liability 
for leaders of nongovernmental organizations for "serious breaches" of new restrictive regulations; much tougher sanctions for violating rules on public assembly; and new restrictions on the Internet
 that could easily shut down big social networking sites. Critics of the
 Kremlin have been subject to vicious harassment, intimidation and 
grotesque public smear campaigns.
For years Russian human 
rights defenders have tried to draw attention to the lack of 
independence of the courts. With the unprecedented attention to the 
Pussy Riot trial, the surreal state of justice when political interests 
are at stake is there for all to see. What we really should be wondering
 isn't why Pussy Riot is so distinctive, but whether it's just the tip 
of the iceberg.
Too often, foreign 
governments have resorted to wishful thinking about the direction Russia
 is heading. Talking about human rights at a high level -- where all 
things in Russia are decided -- is unpleasant business. It might be 
hard, but Russia won't respect other governments if they shy away.
If three women in the 
defendants' cage had the courage to speak out about where Russia is 
headed, surely members of the international community should too. They, 
at least, won't be thrown in jail.